In her text
‘Method Meets Art’, scholar Patricia Leavy (2009) defines arts-based research
as;
“a set of methodological tools used
by qualitative researchers across the disciplines during all phases of social
research including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and
representation. These emerging tools adapt the tenets of the creative arts in
order to address social research questions in holistic and engaged ways in
which theory and practice are intertwined.”
Paula added
that arts-based research is incredibly reflexive (Gibbons, 2008) and can
therefore be approached and evaluated with varying disciplinary knowledges
(Lawrence, 2010). Furthermore, “Arts-based methods draw on literary writing,
music, performance, dance, visual art, film, and other mediums” (Leavy, 2009)
which means that research can be drawn from a number of different disciplines.
Although sources, such as literary writing, may be referring to a particular
knowledge (Eraut, 1992), more of a universal meaning can be found and applied
to others. Paula discussed that we should be developing a thinking for drawing
on a number of different stimuli, both professional and academic, when
approaching studies. In regards to my own position, carrying out my inquiry as
part of module three studies, I am expected to look at a number of literature
sources between the margin of ten and twenty as proposed by the module three
handbook. Although it seems like a large number, I have found various
practitioners that cover my inquiry topic for creative collaboration and
leadership within theatre production often cite others which lead me to the
referenced works. As mentioned by myself previously, the consensus found for
creative collaboration on my literature review has been very much in favour.
Practitioners cite it as detrimental to successful projects. However, when
given context, it has been the environment in which they are explored that has
prompted discussion for its degree of success.
Before
giving a demonstration for carrying out arts-based research, Paula cited that
arts-based research has developed out of transdisciplinary study. In a later
work of hers titled ‘Essentials of Transdisciplinary Research’, Leavy (2011)
paraphrases Sinner et. al (2006) in saying that “practices emerged from the 1970s
to 1990s and now constitute a significant methodological genre”. She mentions
herself that “arts-based research has developed in a transdisciplinary methods
context involving the crossing of disciplinary borders as well as
cross-disciplinary collaborations” (2009). Multi and interdisciplinary
approaches deal with distinct disciplines “co-existing” within a project
(Johnson, 2001) and new assumptions emerging from the result of a collaboration
(Austin et al, 2008) respectively. Meanwhile, knowledge transcends to
transdisciplinary when a project “team spends ample time developing a research
agenda: identifying key topics, building shared definitions and concepts, and
developing a conceptual framework for the study that is not the property of any
one discipline” (Leavy, 2011).
Paula mentioned, however, that new
knowledge gained through transdisciplinary means is not restricted to the
professional and organisational contexts and that the societal (Reader Five, 2015)
or audience receiving the work can also benefit from the process. A
transdisciplinary approach to research is always problem-based (Leavy, 2011),
whether that be an internal issue between the creative team or instead a more
societal theme that they wish to address with their perspective audience. Paula
then turned our attention to an online news article promoting a recently staged
production of Stephen Sondheim’s musical ‘Sweeney Todd’ (see the post here).
The article charts the transfer of the theatre production from a real-life pie
shop in Tooting, London to a replica that is placed within the heart of the
West End. The idea for staging the production in this manner was not only an
idea influenced by the narrative of the material being used but to also provoke
members of the community to come together and celebrate artistic work being
produced within a well-known local establishment. This idea for staging the
production is clearly influenced from previous theatre practitioners whose aims
were the same when it came to provoking a change in thought in their
prospective audience, notably the work of Bertolt Brecht. Brecht developed a
mode of theatre known as ‘Epic Theatre’ which seeks not for an audience to
empathise with character and narrative but critically reflect on social affairs
being alluded to via conventions not found in that of naturalistic acting (a
full breakdown of these can be found on the following web article). One
technique in particular, known as direct address (Brecht, 1964), involves
actors engaging directly with their audience, breaking the “fourth wall”,
meaning the space that separates the audience from the action onstage is
shattered and the allusion of narrative is broken. However, whilst parallels
can be found between the two it is really the aim is not to challenge a
perspective as complex as political agenda like Brecht intended with his work,
but instead raise an awareness for how immersive and visually stimulating storytelling
within theatre can be. This is an example of transdisciplinary action working
effectively. Paula also mentioned the text “The Theory of the Avant Garde”
(Peter Bürger, 1984) when
referencing that it is not just about doing the art form but putting it
together in a way that hasn’t been seen before. This is an argument that Bürger
(1984) makes in his work, that in our
proposed age of postmodernism “two essential insights come together… first,
that it is not in and of themselves that works of art have their effect but
rather that this effect is decisively determined by the institution within
which the works function; second that modes of reception must be based in
social history” (1984).
Paula has asked us prior to attending
the session to prepare art-based research sources that relate to our individual
areas of professional practice and inquiry topics. Unlike the professional or
academic, these are sources that exist on the fringes of our topic focus and
feature some of the key themes we are exploring. An article that has come to
make up part of my literature review is one from the human resources
publication website ‘HRZone’. The article
features an argument for what makes a successful collaborative leader. It goes
onto list three key features that are essential showing leadership in
collaboration;
“Mediation
– Collaborative leaders need to be able to address conflict constructively and
effectively as soon as it arises. This is a demanding skill. Evidence from many
collaborative leadership 360° feedback programmes
suggests that handling conflict and the associated mediation skills are often
the number one leadership priority.
Influencing – Collaborative leaders
need to be able to share control and so choose the best approach to influencing
their partners. This requires an understanding of the organisational culture
and personality type of their partners as well as an objective analysis of the
business situation at hand.
Engaging others – Collaborative leaders
can’t be successful without the skills of networking and relationship building.
This means communicating with clarity, often in high stress situations, and
involving others in decision – making at the right time.”
It is interesting that phrases such as
‘mediation’, ‘organisation’, ‘networking’ and ‘conflict’ should be terms I have
found in my professional and academic literature findings as found in this
article but in a context existing outside the arts. Paula explained that
arts-based research can help ground our theories and make them relatable to
someone outside of our community of practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991). Finding
keywords in literature sources solidifies universal themes that apply across
multiple communities. To conclude the session, Paula asked that we participate
in a couple of collective mind map exercises. In light of the recent US
presidential election result, we used this scenario as a stimulus for
presenting art-based research ideologies within this context. A lot of what
came out of the exercise were of course reactions strongly influenced by Trump
and Clinton’s stances on policies but we agreed that simple phrases
representing themes, as discovered in the previous exercise, can be understood
by various multiple ‘lenses’ (Gardner, 2005). The results of the exercise can
be found below. However, arts-based research is only one aspect of our inquiry,
Paula noted, when it comes to structuring our inquiry it is important to
remember who we are writing for. What is the aim of our inquiry and who is the
prospective audience in mind who will benefit from our findings?
Archer, D 2013 “What makes a
collaborative leader?” HRZone [online]
Available at: http://www.hrzone.com/talent/development/what-makes-a-collaborative-leader
[Accessed 21 Nov. 2016]
Austin et. al, 2008 “From
Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary Research: A Case Study”, Qualitative Health Research, 18, (4) [online]
Available at: http://qhr.sagepub.com/content/18/4/557.short
[Accessed 20. Nov. 2016]
Bürger, P
(1974) Theory of the avant-garde,
1984 re-print, Manchester: Manchester University Press
Brecht, B (1964) Brecht on theatre, 2014 re-print,
London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama
Eraut, M (1992) Developing professional knowledge and
competence (1994 re-print), London: Falmer Press
Gardner, H (1983) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences,
New York: BasicBooks
Gibbons, M 2008 “Why Is Knowledge
Translation Important? Grounding the Conversation”, Technical Brief No. 21 [online] Available at: http://ktdrr.org/ktlibrary/articles_pubs/ncddrwork/focus/focus21/Focus21.pdf
[Accessed 20 Nov. 2016]
Johnson, R 2001 “Historical Returns:
Transdisciplinarity, Cultural Studies, and History”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, (3) [online] Available at:
http://ecs.sagepub.com/content/4/3/261.short
[Accessed 20 Nov. 2016]
Lave, J, Wenger, E, 1991, “Situated
Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation”, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Leavy, P (2008) Method meets art (2009 re-print), New York:
Guilford Press
Leavy, P (2011) Essentials of transdisciplinary research,
Oxford: Routledge
Middlesex University,
Module Two Reader Four, 2015
Sinner et. al 2006, “Arts
Based Research Dissertations: Reviewing the Practices of New Scholars, Canadian Journal of Education, 29, (4) [online]
Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ766913.pdf
[Accessed 20 Nov. 2016]
Cash, J 2011 “Epic Theatre Conventions”
The Drama Teacher [online] Available
at: http://www.thedramateacher.com/epic-theatre-conventions
[Accessed 21 Nov. 2016]
Brown, M 2015, “Pie-shop Sweeney Todd
transfers from Tooting to West End” The
Guardian [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2015/mar/11/sweeney-todd-transfers-tooting-pie-shop-west-end
[Accessed 21. Nov. 2016]
No comments:
Post a Comment